Tuesday, September 17, 2013

Leonardo Transcends Renaissance

Harmony of Space and Plane in da Vinci’s Adoration of the Magi

One of the difficult concepts for some students to grasp when learning about Renaissance art is that of the harmony of opposites.[i] I am revisiting a short research paper written many years ago about an aspect of it, the harmony of space and plane.[ii] I am also reviewing the text to improve accessibility for those newer to the subject. 

This study explores, albeit briefly, the introduction of some elements which point to the harmony of space and plane in the two previous compositional sketches of Leonardo's Adoration of the Magi. Subsequently, it offers an analysis of the different elements which contribute to the said harmony in the (unfinished) final work, followed by a brief comparison of Leonardo’s piece with Botticelli’s Adoration in Washington which should help to understand the artist’s pivotal innovations. 

Undoubtedly, Leonardo da Vinci's work is a masterpiece despite the fact it never passed the stage of an under-drawing, with no colour or even under-paint.

Leonardo da Vinci Adoration of the Magi (c. 1482), Uffizi Gallery, Florence [iii] 
Oil on wood panel, 97 x 96 in (246.4 x 243.8 cm) 
Consulted :9/10/2013

As S.J. Freedberg points out, the relevance of this cartoon lies on the fact that 

In the  Early Renaissance painting in Florence that is contemporary with the Adoration classicizing precedents exist for many separate elements within its style, but nowhere are these elements singly handled as they are by Leonardo, and above all, no other contemporary combines such elements into a comparable whole. (1961, p. 15)

To begin, the two existing studies for the Adoration already show the complexity of the piece Leonardo has in mind. The earlier one, a compositional sketch, contributes a couple of important elements to the final work: the architectural ruins of the vaults and staircase in the background, and, more importantly, the arrangement of the central group composed by the Madonna and Child together with the adoring figures to its right. (Costantino & Reid, 1991, p. 58)

Leonardo da Vinci, Compositional Sketch for the "Adoration" (c.1481), Uffizi Gallery, Florence[iv]
Pen and ink, traces of silverpoint and white on paper, 11.22 x 8.46 in (28.5 x 21.5 cm)  Source: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e2/Leonardo%2C_studio_per_l%27adorazione_dei_magi%2C_louvre.jpg 
Consulted: 9/10/2013

In essence, in Leonardo’s earliest study the relationship among the figures and of the figures to their setting is incongruent, and the artist shows a rather unskilled handling of the perspective configuration. (Costantino & Reid, 1991, pp. 58-61)  The perspective scheme creates an axis that intersects the picture plane which is emphasised by the group of figures parallel to it; consequently, the overall impression is not that of a unified and harmonious three dimensional composition. (Costantino & Reid, 1991, p. 61) In addition, the horizontal division of the canvas into two superimposed bands contributes to the disjointed effect: the lower band presents the group of figures in the central scene and the upper one displays the architecture with a staircase that leads the eyes of the observer away, and not towards the central scene.


As Costantino and Reid point out, the imperfections evident in the first sketch are, nevertheless, resolved in a later perspective study below. (1991, p. 61)

Leonardo da Vinci, Perspective Study for the adoration of the Magi (c. 1481), Ufizzi Gallery, Florence [v]
Pen and ink, traces of silverpoint and white on paper, 6.42 x 11.42 (16.3 x 29 cm)
Leonardo exchanges the difficult handling of the perspective in the previous sketch for a definitively plausible spatial layout. (Costantino & Reid, 1991, p. 61) In this second sketch, Leonardo achieves a coherent space noticeably by sitting the vanishing point askew on the horizon line; by representing space not only through orthogonal lines but also by introducing Alberti's perspective scheme - shown in Leonardo’s sketch by the division of the tiled floor surface; and partly by “peopling this mathematically exact formula with vibrant figures and exotic beasts.” (Costantino & Reid, 1991, p. 61) To cap this up, Leonardo moves the stairway from right to left, thus guiding the spectator toward the central scene rather than away from it.

Although Leonardo uses basically the same composition of the Perspective Study in the cartoon, some elements are altered in the latter. Essentially, in the final composition, the artist frees the space from most of the architectural structure: he eliminates the traditional stable or shed from his Adoration leaving the space open to accommodate the central group of figures in the foreground and all the other figures around it. (Costantino & Reid, 1991, p. 61)  In such way, Leonardo creates the space not by using the Albertian perspective grid, but by the inversion of the same. (Freedberg, 1961, p. 9) Accordingly, da Vinci’s space “… begins with the figures: their own volume shapes surrounding space. Thus, in a large pictorial structure like the Adoration, the space is a consequence of, an incidental to, the figures’ grouping.” (Freedberg, 1961, p. 9) This can be clearly observed in the drawing bellow in which the tonal gradation of light existing in the cartoon has been eliminated. 

Illustration of the "Adoration" by Fernando Ramirez M. (2013) [vi] 
Ink over pencil on paper, 11.69 x 8.27 in (29.7 x 21) cm
Copy of a drawing by Paul Müller-Walde (1898). 
After the creation of his vast space, Leonardo harmonises it with the two dimensional plane.

As I learned in my Renaissance Art History class, in painting, harmony of space and plane is achieved basically by superposing the closest point, line or plane in the composition over the vanishing point – that is the point, line or plane furthest from the eye. This is done to reduce the depth of illusory three dimensional space and, as a consequence, harmonising the latter with the two dimensional reality of the work of art. In other words, the aim of this artifice is to avoid the occurrence of a natural effect: the perspective leading the eyes of the observer away from the main subject in the composition and into the vanishing point.

In his Adoration, Leonardo precludes this by covering his vanishing point – off centre to the right– with an ilex tree. (Emboden, 1987, pp. 203 & 214) The ilex contributes a very strong vertical placed clearly in the middle ground, forcing the attention of the viewer on the central group of figures in the foreground.

Da Vinci uses other components to reinforce spatial harmony.

For instance, by eliminating most of the architectural structure, he reduces the amount of orthogonals. Likewise, the angles of the sketchy architecture, on the right background at the top, are open and they do not lead toward the vanishing point. 

Left: Leonardo da Vinci’s Adoration, details and source as stated on the image above.
Diagram to the right: Open angles of the architectural structure and main expressive lines of Leonardo’s Adoration.
These deviations from the Albertian one point perspective result in the reduction of depth in the pictorial space; consequently, they contribute to the harmony of space and plane.

To further unify the piece, the artist combines two-dimensional shapes with three dimensional ones. I explain: from a bird’s eye perspective, the figures surrounding the central group, which has the Virgin’s head as its apex, form a pyramid similar to the model previously conceived by Pollaiuollo in his Martyrdom of Saint Sebastian of 1475. (Hartt, 1986, p. 604) The three-dimensional form is contrasted by the evident two-dimensional triangle formed by the figures of the Virgin and the Magi in the foreground. Simply said, the impact of the triangle has a flattening effect on the pictorial space.

Some geometrical lines incorporated to Ramirez' illustration of Leonardo da Vinci’s Adoration.
Likewise, Leonardo contrasts a semi-circle (2-D) with the three-dimensional sort of human niche formed by the figures surrounding the Madonna and Child adding to the same effect.

Ibid.
In his analysis of the work, Freedberg observes quite appropriately that the main expressive  lines form an X - shown above in the image with the main expressive lines, which not only flattens the space but also contributes to the unity of the composition by binding

… together all elements within composition, not only in the foreground but in the background: the distance with its variety of form – less stringently discipline as the scene diffuses into space – is bound into and upon the primary scheme of design. (Freedberg, 1961, p. 8)

Moreover, he continues,
…the linking of the distance and the foreground depends, not on a perspective structure, but on the incorporation of the elements of distance into one pattern with that of the foreground – a pattern that, in this instance, is in the main an ordering in the surface of the picture. (Freedberg, 1961, p. 8)

This same scheme is used in the treatment of light. By bringing some of the background light into the foreground and illuminating the central figures with it, and doing the reverse with the two trees in the middle and background, Leonardo links even more background and foreground. The painter's distribution of light adds to the unity of the composition as well: whereas the bright light that illuminates the background brings this plane closer to the observer, the darkness in the foreground recedes the plane; thus the pictorial space contracts. Similarly, the sfumato light surrounding the dark figures placed around the Virgin and Child, in the middle-ground, flattens this receding space by creating a tonal plane.

In comparing Leonardo’s Adoration with Botticelli’s elegant Washington Adoration of the same period, one can observe some common elements; as occurred often at the time, the two painters probably new of each other’s work.

Sandro Botticelli, Adoration of the Magi (c.1482). National Gallery of Washington. [vii] 
Tempera on wood, 27.6 x 41 in (70 x 103 cm) 

Source: 
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Botticelli_009.jpg
Consulted: 09/17/2013
Both works have the same semi-circular figure arrangement and both form a triangle with the Virgin and the adoring Magi; however, Botticelli’s painting keeps the traditional stable and respects Alberti’s one point perspective. He also places an hypothetical observer at the centre, entirely inside the composition. (Hartt, 1986, p. 329) Consequently, all other worshipers, including us, have no place in the scene. (Hartt, 1986). Hartt detects that the attention of the viewer is therefore directed to the central group of figures. (1986, p. 329) However, with his remark, Hartt neglects to point out that the eyes of the viewer will be drawn, naturally, towards the furthest (vanishing) point, which in Botticelli’s composition is placed to the right, behind the central scene. In such way, the artist guides the regard of the observer away from the focal point of the work. Therefore, despite its inherent beauty and elegance and its similarities with Leonardo's Adoration, Botticelli’s piece is not as successful and innovative as that of Leonardo in its achievement of harmony of space and plane.

In fact, as previously stated, Leonardo’s accomplishments in this area foreshadow that of his contemporaries by a couple of decades. And, it is precisely there where his genius lies: this ability to anticipate his contemporaries and the tendencies that will mark the art of the High Renaissance. A marvelous set of components of this anticipation are featured in his brilliant success harmonising space and plane in his precedent setting Adoration of the Magi.  
                       




[i] See http://www.museum-online.ru/en/Epoch/Renaissance/ for a good summary of the notion; unfortunately, no author.
[ii] Thanks to professor T. Martone for making it the compulsory essay for his Renaissance class.
[iii] According to Wikimedia “This work is in the public domain in the United States and those countries with a copy right term of the life of the author of 100 years or less.” Furthermore, “this file has been identified as been identified as being free of known restrictions under copyright law, including all related neighboring rights."
[iv] Ibid.
[v] ibid.
[vi] My thanks to Fernando Ramirez Mendoza for the excellent drawing.
[vii] According to Wikimedia “This work is in the public domain in the United States and those countries with a copy right term of the life of the author of 100 years or less.” Furthermore, “this file has been identified as been identified as being free of known restrictions under copyright law, including all related neighboring rights."


Bibliography

Works Cited

Costantino, Maria & Reid, Aileen (1991). Leonardo. London: Bison Books Ltd.

Freedberg, Sydney J.  (1961). Painting of the High Renaissance in Rome and Florence.Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Emboden, W. A. (1987). Leonardo Da Vinci on Plants and Gardens. Oregon: Discorides Press.

Hartt, Frederick (1986). "The High Renaissance in Central Italy". In F. Hartt, Art, a History of Painting, Sculpture, Architecture (pp. 601-626). New York: Harry N. Abrams Inc.

Works Consulted

Hartt, Frederick (1986). History of Italian Renaissance in Rome and Florence. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Heydenreich, Ludwig H. (1974). Leonardo: The Last Supper. London: Allen Lane.

Holt, Elizabeth (1981). A Documentary History of Art: The Middle Ages and the Renaissance. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Leonardo da Vinci, Kemp, Martin ed. (1989). On Painting. New Haven: Yale University Press.
            (1841). Codice Trivulaciano, transcription and notes by Luca Beltrami. No. 144 from a  200 print run. nc/np.

McMullen, Roy (1975). Mona Lisa: The Picture and the Myth. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.

Müller-Walde,Paul (1889 ). Leonardo da Vinci: Lebensskizze und Forschungen über sein Verhältniss zur Florentiner Kunst und du RafaelMunich: Google e-book (consulted 9/2/2013).

Ottino della Chiesa, Angela (1967). La Obra pictórica completa de Leonardo. Barcelona: Editorial Noguer S.A.

Salvini, Roberto (1958). Tutta la pittura del Botticelli. Milan: Rizzoli, 1st ed., vols. I & II.

White, John (1987). Birth and Rebirth of the Pictorial Space. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.